{"id":2995,"date":"2025-04-17T05:40:18","date_gmt":"2025-04-17T05:40:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/?p=2995"},"modified":"2025-04-17T05:40:20","modified_gmt":"2025-04-17T05:40:20","slug":"domicile-policy-row-in-ladakh-jamyang-tsering-namgyals-1954-proposal-rejected-apex-kda-demands-1989-cutoff","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/index.php\/2025\/04\/17\/domicile-policy-row-in-ladakh-jamyang-tsering-namgyals-1954-proposal-rejected-apex-kda-demands-1989-cutoff\/","title":{"rendered":"Domicile Policy Row in Ladakh: Jamyang Tsering Namgyal\u2019s 1954 Proposal Rejected, APEX-KDA Demands 1989 Cutoff"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong>Ladakh, 15<sup>th<\/sup> April, 2025: <\/strong>Former Member of Parliament from Ladakh, <strong>Jamyang Tsering Namgyal<\/strong>, has reignited a contentious debate with his recent disclosure that he had proposed a domicile policy with <strong>1954 as the eligibility cutoff year<\/strong> to the APEX Committee-KDA (APEX-KDA). Namgyal claimed that the proposal had received verbal support from the Union Home Minister, but was ultimately not accepted.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cI had suggested that individuals residing in Ladakh since 1954 should be eligible for domicile status. I was able to convince the Home Minister on the matter, but unfortunately, the proposal was not approved,\u201d Namgyal said while addressing the issue.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The statement has triggered strong reactions from various political stakeholders in Ladakh, highlighting the region\u2019s deep-rooted concerns around <strong>demographic shifts, cultural preservation, environmental sustainability, and employment opportunities<\/strong> for locals.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In response, <strong>Tsering Dorjey Lakrook<\/strong>, senior leader of the APEX-KDA\u2014an alliance that has been leading demands for Sixth Schedule protection for Ladakh\u2014firmly rejected the 1954 suggestion.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cWe are clear in our demand. The domicile eligibility cutoff must be <strong>1989<\/strong>, not 1954. If 1954 was ever on the table, there should be no issue in accepting 1989 today,\u201d Lakrook stated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The APEX-KDA has consistently maintained that the <strong>1989 cutoff year<\/strong> reflects a more appropriate benchmark, aligned with the socio-political dynamics of the region post-independence and prior to major migratory changes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This development comes amid broader calls for <strong>constitutional safeguards<\/strong> under the Sixth Schedule to ensure the protection of Ladakh\u2019s indigenous identity and equitable development. The Centre\u2019s response to these renewed demands will likely shape the next phase of the region\u2019s administrative and political trajectory.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ladakh, 15th April, 2025: Former Member of Parliament from Ladakh, Jamyang Tsering Namgyal, has reignited a contentious debate with his recent disclosure that he had proposed a domicile policy with 1954 as the eligibility cutoff year to the APEX Committee-KDA (APEX-KDA). Namgyal claimed that the proposal had received verbal support from the Union Home Minister, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2996,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[34,30],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-2995","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-jammu","8":"category-jammu-kashmir"},"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.4 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Domicile Policy Row in Ladakh: Jamyang Tsering Namgyal\u2019s 1954 Proposal Rejected, APEX-KDA Demands 1989 Cutoff - Pro Bharat News<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/index.php\/2025\/04\/17\/domicile-policy-row-in-ladakh-jamyang-tsering-namgyals-1954-proposal-rejected-apex-kda-demands-1989-cutoff\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Domicile Policy Row in Ladakh: Jamyang Tsering Namgyal\u2019s 1954 Proposal Rejected, APEX-KDA Demands 1989 Cutoff - Pro Bharat News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Ladakh, 15th April, 2025: Former Member of Parliament from Ladakh, Jamyang Tsering Namgyal, has reignited a contentious debate with his recent disclosure that he had proposed a domicile policy with 1954 as the eligibility cutoff year to the APEX Committee-KDA (APEX-KDA). Namgyal claimed that the proposal had received verbal support from the Union Home Minister, [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/index.php\/2025\/04\/17\/domicile-policy-row-in-ladakh-jamyang-tsering-namgyals-1954-proposal-rejected-apex-kda-demands-1989-cutoff\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Pro Bharat News\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-04-17T05:40:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-04-17T05:40:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/IMG-20250417-WA0020.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"400\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"400\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/probharatnews.com\\\/index.php\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/17\\\/domicile-policy-row-in-ladakh-jamyang-tsering-namgyals-1954-proposal-rejected-apex-kda-demands-1989-cutoff\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/probharatnews.com\\\/index.php\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/17\\\/domicile-policy-row-in-ladakh-jamyang-tsering-namgyals-1954-proposal-rejected-apex-kda-demands-1989-cutoff\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/probharatnews.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/a673e7b51621ba4345d6ef1ec7d0d0f0\"},\"headline\":\"Domicile Policy Row in Ladakh: Jamyang Tsering Namgyal\u2019s 1954 Proposal Rejected, APEX-KDA Demands 1989 Cutoff\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-04-17T05:40:18+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-04-17T05:40:20+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/probharatnews.com\\\/index.php\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/17\\\/domicile-policy-row-in-ladakh-jamyang-tsering-namgyals-1954-proposal-rejected-apex-kda-demands-1989-cutoff\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":273,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/probharatnews.com\\\/index.php\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/17\\\/domicile-policy-row-in-ladakh-jamyang-tsering-namgyals-1954-proposal-rejected-apex-kda-demands-1989-cutoff\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/probharatnews.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/IMG-20250417-WA0020.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Jammu\",\"Jammu &amp; Kashmir\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/probharatnews.com\\\/index.php\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/17\\\/domicile-policy-row-in-ladakh-jamyang-tsering-namgyals-1954-proposal-rejected-apex-kda-demands-1989-cutoff\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/probharatnews.com\\\/index.php\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/17\\\/domicile-policy-row-in-ladakh-jamyang-tsering-namgyals-1954-proposal-rejected-apex-kda-demands-1989-cutoff\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/probharatnews.com\\\/index.php\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/17\\\/domicile-policy-row-in-ladakh-jamyang-tsering-namgyals-1954-proposal-rejected-apex-kda-demands-1989-cutoff\\\/\",\"name\":\"Domicile Policy Row in Ladakh: Jamyang Tsering Namgyal\u2019s 1954 Proposal Rejected, APEX-KDA Demands 1989 Cutoff - Pro Bharat News\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/probharatnews.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/probharatnews.com\\\/index.php\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/17\\\/domicile-policy-row-in-ladakh-jamyang-tsering-namgyals-1954-proposal-rejected-apex-kda-demands-1989-cutoff\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/probharatnews.com\\\/index.php\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/17\\\/domicile-policy-row-in-ladakh-jamyang-tsering-namgyals-1954-proposal-rejected-apex-kda-demands-1989-cutoff\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/probharatnews.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/IMG-20250417-WA0020.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-04-17T05:40:18+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-04-17T05:40:20+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/probharatnews.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/a673e7b51621ba4345d6ef1ec7d0d0f0\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/probharatnews.com\\\/index.php\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/17\\\/domicile-policy-row-in-ladakh-jamyang-tsering-namgyals-1954-proposal-rejected-apex-kda-demands-1989-cutoff\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/probharatnews.com\\\/index.php\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/17\\\/domicile-policy-row-in-ladakh-jamyang-tsering-namgyals-1954-proposal-rejected-apex-kda-demands-1989-cutoff\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/probharatnews.com\\\/index.php\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/17\\\/domicile-policy-row-in-ladakh-jamyang-tsering-namgyals-1954-proposal-rejected-apex-kda-demands-1989-cutoff\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/probharatnews.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/IMG-20250417-WA0020.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/probharatnews.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/IMG-20250417-WA0020.jpg\",\"width\":400,\"height\":400},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/probharatnews.com\\\/index.php\\\/2025\\\/04\\\/17\\\/domicile-policy-row-in-ladakh-jamyang-tsering-namgyals-1954-proposal-rejected-apex-kda-demands-1989-cutoff\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/probharatnews.com\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Domicile Policy Row in Ladakh: Jamyang Tsering Namgyal\u2019s 1954 Proposal Rejected, APEX-KDA Demands 1989 Cutoff\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/probharatnews.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/probharatnews.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"Pro Bharat News\",\"description\":\"Digital Media News &amp; Information Portal\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/probharatnews.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/probharatnews.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/a673e7b51621ba4345d6ef1ec7d0d0f0\",\"name\":\"admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/35717abfbe9842f778abc58a90b2480bbb059635470de8b3d7fffb0bb3fa5547?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/35717abfbe9842f778abc58a90b2480bbb059635470de8b3d7fffb0bb3fa5547?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/35717abfbe9842f778abc58a90b2480bbb059635470de8b3d7fffb0bb3fa5547?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/probharatnews.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/probharatnews.com\\\/index.php\\\/author\\\/admin\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Domicile Policy Row in Ladakh: Jamyang Tsering Namgyal\u2019s 1954 Proposal Rejected, APEX-KDA Demands 1989 Cutoff - Pro Bharat News","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/index.php\/2025\/04\/17\/domicile-policy-row-in-ladakh-jamyang-tsering-namgyals-1954-proposal-rejected-apex-kda-demands-1989-cutoff\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Domicile Policy Row in Ladakh: Jamyang Tsering Namgyal\u2019s 1954 Proposal Rejected, APEX-KDA Demands 1989 Cutoff - Pro Bharat News","og_description":"Ladakh, 15th April, 2025: Former Member of Parliament from Ladakh, Jamyang Tsering Namgyal, has reignited a contentious debate with his recent disclosure that he had proposed a domicile policy with 1954 as the eligibility cutoff year to the APEX Committee-KDA (APEX-KDA). Namgyal claimed that the proposal had received verbal support from the Union Home Minister, [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/index.php\/2025\/04\/17\/domicile-policy-row-in-ladakh-jamyang-tsering-namgyals-1954-proposal-rejected-apex-kda-demands-1989-cutoff\/","og_site_name":"Pro Bharat News","article_published_time":"2025-04-17T05:40:18+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-04-17T05:40:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":400,"height":400,"url":"https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/IMG-20250417-WA0020.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"admin","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/index.php\/2025\/04\/17\/domicile-policy-row-in-ladakh-jamyang-tsering-namgyals-1954-proposal-rejected-apex-kda-demands-1989-cutoff\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/index.php\/2025\/04\/17\/domicile-policy-row-in-ladakh-jamyang-tsering-namgyals-1954-proposal-rejected-apex-kda-demands-1989-cutoff\/"},"author":{"name":"admin","@id":"https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/a673e7b51621ba4345d6ef1ec7d0d0f0"},"headline":"Domicile Policy Row in Ladakh: Jamyang Tsering Namgyal\u2019s 1954 Proposal Rejected, APEX-KDA Demands 1989 Cutoff","datePublished":"2025-04-17T05:40:18+00:00","dateModified":"2025-04-17T05:40:20+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/index.php\/2025\/04\/17\/domicile-policy-row-in-ladakh-jamyang-tsering-namgyals-1954-proposal-rejected-apex-kda-demands-1989-cutoff\/"},"wordCount":273,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/index.php\/2025\/04\/17\/domicile-policy-row-in-ladakh-jamyang-tsering-namgyals-1954-proposal-rejected-apex-kda-demands-1989-cutoff\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/IMG-20250417-WA0020.jpg","articleSection":["Jammu","Jammu &amp; Kashmir"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/index.php\/2025\/04\/17\/domicile-policy-row-in-ladakh-jamyang-tsering-namgyals-1954-proposal-rejected-apex-kda-demands-1989-cutoff\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/index.php\/2025\/04\/17\/domicile-policy-row-in-ladakh-jamyang-tsering-namgyals-1954-proposal-rejected-apex-kda-demands-1989-cutoff\/","url":"https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/index.php\/2025\/04\/17\/domicile-policy-row-in-ladakh-jamyang-tsering-namgyals-1954-proposal-rejected-apex-kda-demands-1989-cutoff\/","name":"Domicile Policy Row in Ladakh: Jamyang Tsering Namgyal\u2019s 1954 Proposal Rejected, APEX-KDA Demands 1989 Cutoff - Pro Bharat News","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/index.php\/2025\/04\/17\/domicile-policy-row-in-ladakh-jamyang-tsering-namgyals-1954-proposal-rejected-apex-kda-demands-1989-cutoff\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/index.php\/2025\/04\/17\/domicile-policy-row-in-ladakh-jamyang-tsering-namgyals-1954-proposal-rejected-apex-kda-demands-1989-cutoff\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/IMG-20250417-WA0020.jpg","datePublished":"2025-04-17T05:40:18+00:00","dateModified":"2025-04-17T05:40:20+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/a673e7b51621ba4345d6ef1ec7d0d0f0"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/index.php\/2025\/04\/17\/domicile-policy-row-in-ladakh-jamyang-tsering-namgyals-1954-proposal-rejected-apex-kda-demands-1989-cutoff\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/index.php\/2025\/04\/17\/domicile-policy-row-in-ladakh-jamyang-tsering-namgyals-1954-proposal-rejected-apex-kda-demands-1989-cutoff\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/index.php\/2025\/04\/17\/domicile-policy-row-in-ladakh-jamyang-tsering-namgyals-1954-proposal-rejected-apex-kda-demands-1989-cutoff\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/IMG-20250417-WA0020.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/IMG-20250417-WA0020.jpg","width":400,"height":400},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/index.php\/2025\/04\/17\/domicile-policy-row-in-ladakh-jamyang-tsering-namgyals-1954-proposal-rejected-apex-kda-demands-1989-cutoff\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Domicile Policy Row in Ladakh: Jamyang Tsering Namgyal\u2019s 1954 Proposal Rejected, APEX-KDA Demands 1989 Cutoff"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/","name":"Pro Bharat News","description":"Digital Media News &amp; Information Portal","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/#\/schema\/person\/a673e7b51621ba4345d6ef1ec7d0d0f0","name":"admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/35717abfbe9842f778abc58a90b2480bbb059635470de8b3d7fffb0bb3fa5547?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/35717abfbe9842f778abc58a90b2480bbb059635470de8b3d7fffb0bb3fa5547?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/35717abfbe9842f778abc58a90b2480bbb059635470de8b3d7fffb0bb3fa5547?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/probharatnews.com"],"url":"https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/index.php\/author\/admin\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2995","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2995"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2995\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2997,"href":"https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2995\/revisions\/2997"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2996"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2995"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2995"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/probharatnews.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2995"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}